In this 2nd special 100th episode installment, many previous guests answer the question: What is currently the most important disagreement or challenge in neuroscience and/or AI, and what do you think the right answer or direction is? The variety of answers is itself revealing, and highlights how many interesting problems there are to work on.
Timestamps:
0:00 – Intro
7:10 – Rodrigo Quian Quiroga
8:33 – Mazviita Chirimuuta
9:15 – Chris Eliasmith
12:50 – Jim DiCarlo
13:23 – Paul Cisek
16:42 – Nathaniel Daw
17:58 – Jessica Hamrick
19:07 – Russ Poldrack
20:47 – Pieter Roelfsema
22:21 – Konrad Kording
25:16 – Matt Smith
27:55 – Rafal Bogacz
29:17 – John Krakauer
30:47 – Marcel van Gerven
31:49 – György Buzsáki
35:38 – Thomas Naselaris
36:55 – Steve Grossberg
48:32 – David Poeppel
49:24 – Patrick Mayo
50:31 – Stefan Leijnen
54:24 – David Krakuer
58:13 – Wolfang Maass
59:13 – Uri Hasson
59:50 – Steve Potter
1:01:50 – Talia Konkle
1:04:30 – Matt Botvinick
1:06:36 – Brad Love
1:09:46 – Jon Brennan
1:19:31 – Grace Lindsay
1:22:28 – Andrew Saxe
Panelists: Adrienne [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 054 Kanaka Rajan: How Do We Switch Behaviors? This is the second in a series of panel discussions in...
It’s generally agreed machine learning and AI provide neuroscience with tools for analysis and theoretical principles to test in brains, but there is less...
Follow Julie on Twitter: @julie_grollier. Check out Julie’s website, with links to papers and lots of good summaries of things we discuss, like Memristors,...
