In the 4th installment of our 100th episode celebration, previous guests responded to the question:
What ideas, assumptions, or terms do you think is holding back neuroscience/AI, and why?
As usual, the responses are varied and wonderful!
Timestamps:
0:00 – Intro
6:41 – Pieter Roelfsema
7:52 – Grace Lindsay
10:23 – Marcel van Gerven
11:38 – Andrew Saxe
14:05 – Jane Wang
16:50 – Thomas Naselaris
18:14 – Steve Potter
19:18 – Kendrick Kay
22:17 – Blake Richards
27:52 – Jay McClelland
30:13 – Jim DiCarlo
31:17 – Talia Konkle
33:27 – Uri Hasson
35:37 – Wolfgang Maass
38:48 – Paul Cisek
40:41 – Patrick Mayo
41:51 – Konrad Kording
43:22 – David Poeppel
44:22 – Brad Love
46:47 – Rodrigo Quian Quiroga
47:36 – Steve Grossberg
48:47 – Mark Humphries
52:35 – John Krakauer
55:13 – György Buzsáki
59:50 – Stefan Leijnan
1:02:18 – Nathaniel Daw
Support the show to get full episodes and join the Discord community. Patryk and I discuss his wide-ranging background working in both the neuroscience...
It’s generally agreed machine learning and AI provide neuroscience with tools for analysis and theoretical principles to test in brains, but there is less...
Support the show to get full episodes and join the Discord community. Check out my short video series about what's missing in AI and...
